<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McAfee associates itself with Jessica Biel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://extralast.com/2009/08/28/mcafee-associates-itself-with-jessica-biel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://extralast.com/2009/08/28/mcafee-associates-itself-with-jessica-biel/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:25:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigerPunk</title>
		<link>http://extralast.com/2009/08/28/mcafee-associates-itself-with-jessica-biel/#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>GigerPunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.extralast.com/?p=749#comment-1064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What the?
That information wasn&#039;t there before was it? That list of 15 celebrities in order of who&#039;s the most &#039;dangerous&#039; to search for*? And stating the Obamas are safer?
I&#039;m sure that wasn&#039;t there before...

(*If you&#039;re a complete and utter tard)

And I&#039;m sure there&#039;s a mistake on #5 - 
It says: &quot;Searching for “Jessica Simpson videos” can mislead unsuspecting surfers to sites with potentially damaging downloads&quot;
Where I think it&#039;s meant to say: &quot;Searching for “Jessica Simpson videos” can lead unsuspecting surfers to a copy of the potentially damaging &quot;Dukes of Hazzard&quot; remake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the?<br />
That information wasn&#8217;t there before was it? That list of 15 celebrities in order of who&#8217;s the most &#8216;dangerous&#8217; to search for*? And stating the Obamas are safer?<br />
I&#8217;m sure that wasn&#8217;t there before&#8230;</p>
<p>(*If you&#8217;re a complete and utter tard)</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s a mistake on #5 &#8211;<br />
It says: &#8220;Searching for “Jessica Simpson videos” can mislead unsuspecting surfers to sites with potentially damaging downloads&#8221;<br />
Where I think it&#8217;s meant to say: &#8220;Searching for “Jessica Simpson videos” can lead unsuspecting surfers to a copy of the potentially damaging &#8220;Dukes of Hazzard&#8221; remake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gargleman</title>
		<link>http://extralast.com/2009/08/28/mcafee-associates-itself-with-jessica-biel/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>gargleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.extralast.com/?p=749#comment-1063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Giger - and how will Jennifer Aniston feel about her association with the &quot;FunLove&quot; virus?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giger &#8211; and how will Jennifer Aniston feel about her association with the &#8220;FunLove&#8221; virus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McAfee associates itself with Jessica Biel &#8211; EXTRA-LAST &#124; MyDailySecurity.com</title>
		<link>http://extralast.com/2009/08/28/mcafee-associates-itself-with-jessica-biel/#comment-1062</link>
		<dc:creator>McAfee associates itself with Jessica Biel &#8211; EXTRA-LAST &#124; MyDailySecurity.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.extralast.com/?p=749#comment-1062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] McAfee associates itself with Jessica Biel &#8211; EXTRA-LAST    28Aug2009  Filed under: McAfee Author: Author     Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.Powered by WP Greet Box(BUSINESS WIRE)–Jessica Biel has overtaken Brad Pitt as the most dangerous celebrity to search in cyberspace, according to Internet security company McAfee, Inc. (NYSE:MFE). For the third year in a row, McAfee researched Hollywood&#8217;s &#8230;       Link: McAfee associates itself with Jessica Biel &#8211; EXTRA-LAST [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] McAfee associates itself with Jessica Biel &#8211; EXTRA-LAST    28Aug2009  Filed under: McAfee Author: Author     Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.Powered by WP Greet Box(BUSINESS WIRE)–Jessica Biel has overtaken Brad Pitt as the most dangerous celebrity to search in cyberspace, according to Internet security company McAfee, Inc. (NYSE:MFE). For the third year in a row, McAfee researched Hollywood&#8217;s &#8230;       Link: McAfee associates itself with Jessica Biel &#8211; EXTRA-LAST [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanette Krankie</title>
		<link>http://extralast.com/2009/08/28/mcafee-associates-itself-with-jessica-biel/#comment-1061</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanette Krankie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.extralast.com/?p=749#comment-1061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She is a dirty, dirty, girl!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is a dirty, dirty, girl!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigerPunk</title>
		<link>http://extralast.com/2009/08/28/mcafee-associates-itself-with-jessica-biel/#comment-1060</link>
		<dc:creator>GigerPunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.extralast.com/?p=749#comment-1060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trilby - Shows promise but needs tags and a search facility so you can quickly see if any from your local council are there...

Back on topic though, Jessica Biel linked with viruses? Dirty girl...
I smell a lawsuit against McAfee for libel/slander (whichever it is)

Nice how they don&#039;t offer advice as to which celebrities are the safest to look for, that wouldn&#039;t been more useful, surely?
Su Pollard? Jeanette Krankie? Lynsey De Paul?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trilby &#8211; Shows promise but needs tags and a search facility so you can quickly see if any from your local council are there&#8230;</p>
<p>Back on topic though, Jessica Biel linked with viruses? Dirty girl&#8230;<br />
I smell a lawsuit against McAfee for libel/slander (whichever it is)</p>
<p>Nice how they don&#8217;t offer advice as to which celebrities are the safest to look for, that wouldn&#8217;t been more useful, surely?<br />
Su Pollard? Jeanette Krankie? Lynsey De Paul?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trilby</title>
		<link>http://extralast.com/2009/08/28/mcafee-associates-itself-with-jessica-biel/#comment-1059</link>
		<dc:creator>Trilby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.extralast.com/?p=749#comment-1059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was in the Metro today:
http://glumcouncillors.tumblr.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was in the Metro today:<br />
<a href="http://glumcouncillors.tumblr.com/" rel="nofollow">http://glumcouncillors.tumblr.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
